tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-78924313577553459792024-03-05T21:19:31.865-08:00SpuriofactA spuriofact is spurious information that is purported to be true by orthodox experts or official government sources. Spuriofacts are widely believed scientific fallacies, or else unsubstantiated scientific claims.Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-10079402618837227852023-11-12T01:31:00.000-08:002023-11-12T01:31:16.046-08:00The British Medical Journal on the Spinach Supermyth<p> I am delighted to see the importance of the Spinach Supermyth, which I (Dr Mike Sutton) discovered in 2009, is now positively affirmed as a problem in the British medical Journal in 2023. The free PDF of that important article is available to download <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375417092_Burden_of_proof_combating_inaccurate_citation_in_biomedical_literature">HERE</a></p><p><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;">The BMJ page on it is </span><a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj-2023-076441" style="background-color: white; color: #249fa3; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">HERE</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;"> (archived </span><a href="https://archive.is/w8eii" style="background-color: white; color: #249fa3; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">HERE</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;">)</span><br /></p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAZtBmUxnOMV7dniOvMY-z_zIOoBwZuuqVVV_QPmKy_t5vOlLN6twwVoTKUK975ZDe4hjH4H2ooNC0M2Ttxm_TFWfviHLpRQRbJ_Pix1mv0YcVtQR9HRo4KLDHGhIHa75PQ8hZj4Xca40_y9XT3GDXnP4N3lvmpOC54Pw8PN2GQ6efOtyfx3X6HJhCCnw/s994/Popeye.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="608" data-original-width="994" height="245" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAZtBmUxnOMV7dniOvMY-z_zIOoBwZuuqVVV_QPmKy_t5vOlLN6twwVoTKUK975ZDe4hjH4H2ooNC0M2Ttxm_TFWfviHLpRQRbJ_Pix1mv0YcVtQR9HRo4KLDHGhIHa75PQ8hZj4Xca40_y9XT3GDXnP4N3lvmpOC54Pw8PN2GQ6efOtyfx3X6HJhCCnw/w400-h245/Popeye.png" width="400" /></a></div><p><br /></p>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-33794501886297162372023-01-13T08:48:00.003-08:002023-01-13T08:48:33.411-08:00The Darwin Science Fraud is bust by the facts<p> Charles Darwin, liar, plagiarist and theory thief. Get the actual facts.</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="362" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/x6GcGNR9H7Y" width="473" youtube-src-id="x6GcGNR9H7Y"></iframe></div><br /><p><br /></p>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-81741784733747496602020-02-16T14:23:00.000-08:002020-02-17T03:24:33.883-08:00Dr Mike Sutton's Bragging Rights<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1734494931592132376" itemprop="description articleBody" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, tahoma, helvetica, freesans, sans-serif; line-height: 1.4; position: relative; width: 590px;">
<h2 style="border-bottom: 1px solid transparent; color: #222222; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-weight: 400; line-height: 1.05em; margin: 0px 10px 0.5em 20px; padding: 0.6em 0px 0.5em; position: relative;">
<strong>Biography and Bragging Rights (BBR)</strong></h2>
<div style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(170, 177, 35); color: #222222; font-family: arial, tahoma, helvetica, freesans, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: 13px;">Read Dr Mike Sutton's bombshellđŁđĽđ¨ BBR </span><b><a href="https://super-myths.blogspot.com/2020/02/mike-suttons-biography-and-bragging.html">HERE</a></b><br />
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
</div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Don't hide your light. <br>Get your <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/swagon?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#swagon</a> in 2020. <br>Have you published your <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BioBraggingRights?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BioBraggingRights</a>? (BBR)<br><br>Remember this formula <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MoreSwaggerMoreSway?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MoreSwaggerMoreSway</a>. <br>The new 21st century BBR is far better than a C20th CV - whilst incorporating your current CV.<br>Mine is here: <a href="https://t.co/UaTg37f1Mc">https://t.co/UaTg37f1Mc</a> <a href="https://t.co/gPQ42RmhEp">pic.twitter.com/gPQ42RmhEp</a></p>— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dysology/status/1229359830403555328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-81915533238470515812020-01-23T06:13:00.000-08:002020-01-23T06:13:16.173-08:00Ton Munnich busts the Darwin and Matthew spuriofacts promoted by Darwinian cultists More spuriofacts destroyed in the Netherlands<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/noRojlrJFlI/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/noRojlrJFlI?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-4454636288940470542018-04-16T13:29:00.000-07:002018-04-16T13:33:51.876-07:00Many Spuriofacts in the Oxford English Dictionary and Scholarly Works are Busted Today<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Several supermyths (myths arising from bogus mythbusts) busted in this peer reviewed scholarly paper:<br><br>1. The Humpty Dumpty myth<br>2. The Google origin myth<br>3. The Marshal McLuhan coined Moral panic Myth<br><br>And the Selfish Gene mythbust for an added bonus <a href="https://t.co/1nWNyaO6ZN">https://t.co/1nWNyaO6ZN</a></p>— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) <a href="https://twitter.com/supermyths/status/985970031455621121?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-23636710880117791492018-01-14T00:54:00.001-08:002018-01-14T00:54:19.832-08:00Book Piracy<h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/beware-criminal-hackers-cyberstalkers.html" style="color: #444444; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal; text-decoration-line: none;">Beware Criminal Hackers, Cyberstalkers, Book Pirating Copyright Fraudsters and Criminal Identity Fraudsters</a></h3>
<div class="post-header" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px 0px 1em;">
<div class="post-header-line-1">
</div>
</div>
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-9130217489844761603" itemprop="description articleBody" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.4; position: relative; width: 586px;">
<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDkJE7NPsfRiwuBthBcIHTWILePVCzhPPDok0G-wIypOJagUik-5CQkt7DuiCFnr02vk4xefU-DXnKPmtls0bks5vA0CHDLeKSBUkG_9opc_3YUtoRtzAUPbsMIb9S6O9KZw9EjSNJtN8/s1600/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; color: #4d469c; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" data-original-height="287" data-original-width="228" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDkJE7NPsfRiwuBthBcIHTWILePVCzhPPDok0G-wIypOJagUik-5CQkt7DuiCFnr02vk4xefU-DXnKPmtls0bks5vA0CHDLeKSBUkG_9opc_3YUtoRtzAUPbsMIb9S6O9KZw9EjSNJtN8/s200/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="158" /></a><i>Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret</i> <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration-line: none;"><b>600-page Kindle e-book</b></a>. Currently unavailable due to ongoing investigations into criminal book piracy, copyright fraud, cyberstalking, criminal malicious communications, malware dissemination and ID fraud by cybercriminals who have hacked it and those who are disseminating illegal hacked versions of it.<br /><br />From November 2017, you are advised not to download any version of this e-book, because the file is likely to be infected with hacker malware by those sharing and disseminating the hacked files. Moreover, the hacked content is likely to have been altered by the criminals involved.<br /><br />Please purchase the official paperback abridged version from Amazon <b><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration-line: none;">here.</a> </b>Paperback volumes 2 and 3 are forthcoming.<br /><br /><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 4px; position: relative; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhrHHz_VwsJcrFa4soD_EfJ2CZaBF78jcc_MzD-0iyGZ1PNW0i8l2QBPFMp_jeEsb0QBv2uZ5MrOts7M2Gf3NKmbk5I2_dvnz6-EIHb0Uhgtpb8CWX4Q9HB_wy-IjeihJgNgy8y_Ct1FM/s1600/NulliusFullCoverBigBest.png" imageanchor="1" style="color: #4d469c; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" data-original-height="833" data-original-width="1146" height="290" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhrHHz_VwsJcrFa4soD_EfJ2CZaBF78jcc_MzD-0iyGZ1PNW0i8l2QBPFMp_jeEsb0QBv2uZ5MrOts7M2Gf3NKmbk5I2_dvnz6-EIHb0Uhgtpb8CWX4Q9HB_wy-IjeihJgNgy8y_Ct1FM/s400/NulliusFullCoverBigBest.png" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 10.4px;">Paperback volume 1 of Nullius. Available <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration-line: none;">from Amazon,</a> all good bookshops<br /> and libraries worldwide<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-80053105699585708392017-03-23T02:05:00.000-07:002017-03-23T02:05:04.387-07:00Beware the Elk Theory Trap in Seeking to Make the Complex Clear<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Beware An example <a href="https://twitter.com/Hollyonline">@Hollyonline</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/JournalistaLtd">@JournalistaLtd</a> of the "Anne Elk Theory Trap" in seeking to "make the complex clear" <a href="https://t.co/JAHAvoQzNV">https://t.co/JAHAvoQzNV</a> <a href="https://t.co/8BJBcl3QpH">pic.twitter.com/8BJBcl3QpH</a></p>— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dysology/status/844832541458685952">March 23, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-27699960447196100452017-03-04T01:47:00.001-08:002017-03-04T01:47:18.536-08:00The Independently Verifiable Truth is Out!<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Pure Fact-Led Truth:It will always out in the end. Nullius is currently ranked 20 on <a href="https://t.co/iGl1uro5GB">https://t.co/iGl1uro5GB</a> <a href="https://t.co/jkKbs5dEZ7">https://t.co/jkKbs5dEZ7</a> <a href="https://t.co/HRR2gD22Vl">pic.twitter.com/HRR2gD22Vl</a></p>— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) <a href="https://twitter.com/Criminotweet/status/837957294868557824">March 4, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-41207925786314134772016-11-10T14:23:00.001-08:002016-11-10T14:23:58.156-08:00The Humpty Dumpty Colchester Cannon Myth is Bust<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">One particularly entertaining example, but nevertheless an important one because it superbly demonstrates the power and multidisciplinary application of the method to solve long-standing historical problems, is what the IDD Big Data research method (<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U">Sutton 2014</a>) revealed about the etymological origin of the naming of the nursery rhyme character Humpty Dumpty. This was a great etymological mystery dating back to the 19th century.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOB1c66u3FzcbbJg-1zogL5BjyJCu6liMyHxdaFJ-bqklfDqIjz84iHGwmgVQCqot1qF4QMy6CzJRIoneWU-kKW2wH3MBuSz_00FgWmpzrygMCerY1RA7n17r_LViYTMFxyoNXNViy7XQ4/s1600/HumptyDumpty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOB1c66u3FzcbbJg-1zogL5BjyJCu6liMyHxdaFJ-bqklfDqIjz84iHGwmgVQCqot1qF4QMy6CzJRIoneWU-kKW2wH3MBuSz_00FgWmpzrygMCerY1RA7n17r_LViYTMFxyoNXNViy7XQ4/s400/HumptyDumpty.jpg" width="335" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The online Oxford English Dictionary (OED) (2012) notes an alcoholic beverage named âHumtie Dumtieâ is noted in published print dated 1698. However,unevidenced claims abound to explain the alleged literary influence for the original 18th century nursery rhyme character that came to be represented 74 years later in Lewis Carrollâs (1871) Alice Through the Looking Glass. Dutra, (2005. P. 165) and Foster (2008) for example, claim on the basis of no independently verifiable evidence whatsoever, that the name for and natural wall-sitting habitats of this character originate from âHumpty Dumptyâ being a Royalist forces cannon that fell off a wall in the English Civil War.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-size: large;">At the time of writing, the OEDâs earliest recorded example of the name being applied to a character is 1785. Surpassing that, in November 2013 (see Sutton 2014a) IDD revealed that a classical stage character named Punchanello (AKA Punchinello), is currently the earliest independently verifiable cultural influence for an egg-shaped character being called Humpty Dumpty:</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>âBeau Humpty-dumpty next appears,</i></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>A merry Lump well grown in Years,</i></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>With Back and Breast like Punchanello."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> (Anonymous 1701, p. 28)</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">IDD revealed also the observation by Pepys (1665) of a Parliamentary forces cannon named Punchinello. That finding triangulates the significance of the Punchanello-Humpty-Dumpty discovery by neatly debunking the un-evidenced Royalist cannon myth and providing a most compelling clue to explain its obscure origins (see Sutton 2014a). This discovery shows that the IDD method, even in the hands of the amateur, is a myth-busting research tool, which on occasion performs better than etymology and cultural history experts informing the OED and other renowned sources. Simply having the power to date and Boolean search in one go within tens of millions of documents enables sociological, historical and etymological myths to be bust and entrenched problems solved.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<h3 style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">References</span></h3>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 16px; margin-bottom: 0.42cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Anonymous (1701) A rod for Tunbridge beaus, bundl'd up at the request of the Tunbridge Ladies. To Jerk Fools into more Wit and Clowns onto more Manners. A Burlesque Poem. London.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Carroll, L. (1871) Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There. Macmillan.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Dutra, S. (2005) Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics: The Strange Theory of Light in a Box. New Jersey. John Wiley.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Foster, S. (2008) Hey Diddle-Diddle: Our Best-Loved Nursery Rhymes and What They Really Mean. Chichester. Summerdale Publishers.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Oxford English Dictionary Online (2012). http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/89440</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Pepys, S. (1665) The Diary of Samuel Pepys, Volume 2. Random House. New York.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;">Sutton, M. (2014) <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U">Nullius in Verba: Darwinâs greatest secret. Cary. USA Thinker Media. Thinker Books.</a></span><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-71640512758109013402016-09-04T07:03:00.003-07:002016-09-04T07:03:53.996-07:00Darwinist Spuriofacts are Destroyed by Hard Evidence<h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/the-main-facts-that-prove-pseudo.html" style="color: #444444; font-stretch: normal; text-decoration: none;">The 10 Fact Groups that Prove Darwinities Undone</a></h3>
<div class="post-header" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px 0px 1em;">
<div class="post-header-line-1">
</div>
</div>
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-6864937307499718630" itemprop="description articleBody" style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; position: relative; width: 586.4px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWzdOep_dJiYg1wj9GNYqp7JWy8h_BR3i7w-ZKHNxk5WtL7u6k8Qg_KTYVVmtAejvhcWADlmfmvK2SH1UQxETbsC3GuAYXNdC5tyfLiBT9HkQ_3cbTQ4kmvKnCsez5J5R8lbmSjrVmOeI/s1600/Fact.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="color: #4d469c; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration: none;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWzdOep_dJiYg1wj9GNYqp7JWy8h_BR3i7w-ZKHNxk5WtL7u6k8Qg_KTYVVmtAejvhcWADlmfmvK2SH1UQxETbsC3GuAYXNdC5tyfLiBT9HkQ_3cbTQ4kmvKnCsez5J5R8lbmSjrVmOeI/s400/Fact.jpg" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="500" /></a></div>
<br /><h4 style="font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<b>Introduction</b></h4>
<br />The paradigm of Darwin's and Wallace's (1858) and Darwin's (1842, 1844 and 1859) independent conceptions of Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published conception of the full and complex hypothesis of macro evolution by natural selection is based on the premise (e.g de <a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/155/960/321" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Beer 1962</a> and <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pHThtE2R0UQC&pg=PA499&dq=%22patrick+matthew%22+%22read%22+%22darwin%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBDgUahUKEwiP6vqA_cbHAhVRStsKHUjGDQs#v=onepage&q=%22patrick%20matthew%22%20%22read%22%20%22darwin%22&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Mayr 1982</a> ) that no one known to Darwin or Wallace, indeed no naturalists at all, read Matthew's (1831) original conception before they replicated it. That Darwinite paradigm is based on a punctured myth. Because it is newly discovered by me (<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014</a>) that other naturalists, indeed naturalists well known to Darwin and Wallace, their influencers, and their influencer's influencers in fact <i>did</i> read, and then actually cite in the pre-1858 literature, Matthew's (1831) book before either Darwin or Wallace so much as put pen to private notebook on the topic.<br /><br />Those seeking to maintain the paradigm of Darwin's and Wallace's independent conceptions of Matthew's prior-published conception of evolution by natural selection are undone by the following ten groups of facts.<br /><br /><h4 style="font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
Veracity: the 10 groups of facts</h4>
<b><br /></b><b>FACTS</b> <b>1. </b>Only Matthew (1831) in his book<a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DmYDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=on+naval+timber&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjx9orwruvOAhWCph4KHRSaAMoQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=on%20naval%20timber&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"> On Naval Timber</a> wrote about Natural Selection as an explanation for organic macro evolution before Darwin and Wallace (1858) and Darwin (1859) replicated his original ideas. This is established by many biologists including, for example, <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B003P2WIXM/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Dawkins (2010) in Bryson's edited collection</a>, By <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bij.12524/abstract" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Weale (2014)</a> and by Royal Society Darwin Medal winner <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pHThtE2R0UQC&pg=PA499&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Ernst Mayr </a>who wrote:<span style="color: #666666; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"><i> </i></span></span>'<i>The person who has the soundest claim for priority in establishing a theory or evolution by natural selection is Patrick Matthew.'</i><br /><i><br /></i><b>FACTS 2. </b>Matthew wrote about natural selection throughout his book and not just in its appendix. Darwin wrote a deliberate lie when he claimed Matthew limited his orignal ideas on the topic to his book's appendix and he wrote to Joseph Hooker admitting as much (see <a href="http://britsoccrim.org/new/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014</a>). The <a href="http://patrickmatthew.com/appendix%20myth.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Matthew Appendix Myth is, therefore, bust</a> by the facts. Furthermore, contrary to claims made by Richard<b><a href="http://www.harpercollins.com.au/9780007302574/" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Dawkins (2010) </a></b>and others Matthew's (1831) book was far from obscure. As the citations in<i> <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Nullius</a></i>prove, it was heavily advertised in the first half of the 19th century, reviewed, frequently and cited (many times by Loudon in several books and many times by Selby in his 1842 book on trees. Significantly, it was very prominently advertised on more than half a page in the hugely popular Encyclopedia Britannica in 1842 and cited in the Encyclopedia Britannica again in 1842 in an article (<a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/who-cited-on-naval-timber-before-1858.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">citations to facts here</a>) Moreover, pre -1858, Darwin's private <i>notebook of books to read and books read</i> lists five publications that are now known to cite or advertise Matthew's 1831 book.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 3</b>. Contrary to claims in many academic textbooks and in social media, Darwin did not coin the term <i>natural selection,</i> nor its scientific meaning. Moreover, he did not coin the term a<i>rtificial selection </i>(<i>s</i>ee <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014</a>). Matthew used the term the "natural process of selection" in his 1831 book. And <i>Big Data</i> analysis of over 30 million publications reveals he apparently coined that term. Robert Chambers (anonymous author of the "<a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6dNhAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA169&dq=chambers+vestiges+of+creation&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjzxpChpevOAhWL8RQKHVZQATEQ6AEIKjAC#v=onepage&q=chambers%20vestiges%20of%20creation&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Vestiges of Creation</a>"), who cited <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DmYDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=on+naval+timber&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjU5-2NpuvOAhWENxQKHbWdBJwQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=on%20naval%20timber&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Matthew's (1831) book</a> <i>On Naval Timber </i>in 1832, and then in 1840, cited his second (1839) book "<i>Emigration Fields</i>", which took Matthew's (1831) orignal ideas forward with regard to dealing with the social problem of overpopulation in Britain, was apparently 'first to be second' in writing Matthew's apparently orignal term in his review of Darwin's (1859) <i>Origin of Species</i>. Darwin four-word-shuffled Matthew's term to 'process of natural selection' and in doing so, <i>Big Data</i> analysis reveals he apparently coined that term. See <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014</a> for further details and fully cited facts. Furthermore, Matthew (1831) was first to use the <i><a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22780%2c22780" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Natural versus Artificial Selection Analogy of Differences</a> </i>as an explanatory analogy for macro evolution by natural selection. As the historian Loren Eiseley discovered, Darwin replicated this original idea in his 1844 private essay with regard to Matthew's highly idiosyncratic wild forest versus nursery grown trees example. And I discovered that Wallace (1858) did so more generally in his<i>Ternate paper</i>. When the arch Darwinite Stephen J. Gould (1983 and 2002) set out to rubbish Eiseley's findings he got his own facts wrong and conveniently cherry-stepped away from mentioning this, Eisley's most compelling evidence of Matthew's influence on Darwin (see<a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22823%2c22823" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"> Sutton 2015</a> for the facts). What Gould did is the same grossly misleading biased "cherry stepping" and "cherry picking" misrepresenting de facto fact denial ploy tried by Grzegorz Malec in his so called "review" of my book. It is a shame Eiseley, having died in 1977, could not take Gould to task for his dysology, Malec does not escape. You can read my <a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/en/volumes/48-fag-2016/951-fag-2016-art-01" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">published right of reply: <b>Here</b></a>. Matthew's original general explanatory analogy of differences between artificial and natural selection is so important that Darwin used it to open the very first Chapter of the <i>Origin of Species</i>. <span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">An electronic plagiarism check reveals many examples of great similarity between the prose and ideas of both Wallace and Darwin compared to Matthew's. For </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">example</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">, Darwin replicated Matthew's unique creative process by replicating his examples of how the natural process of selection works. By way of just two examples, in addition to the example of plants grown in nurseries that Eiseley discovered, </span></span><a class="breakable-url" href="https://kindle.amazon.com/post/O-W1ESa8T2mGC-2_kdndBg" style="color: #005588; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Darwin also replicated Matthew's examples of what happens when many seedlings spring up together in a forest. Moreover, he replicated what Matthew cited from Steuart (1828) about cattle eating young trees. <span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url("https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pfnxxtku.png"); background-position: right -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;">. Only where Matthew cited his source about the cattle example, Darwin audaciously pretended it was his own observation in nature. My book, </span><em style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;"><a class="breakable-url" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nullius<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url("https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pfnxxtku.png"); background-position: right -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a></em><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">, has an entire chapter dedicated to many other uniquely discovered examples of Darwin's and Wallace's obvious plagiarism of Matthew's book. </span></span><br /><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">As I reveal (see <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014 for the full citations)</a> Matthewâs original explanatory analogy was, apparently, replicated first </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">by Mudie (1832), then Low (1844), Darwin (1844), Wallace (in Darwin </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">and Wallace 1858) and by Darwin again (1859; 1868). </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">Most tellingly, the same Big Data analysis of over 30 million publications in the publication record reveals that Mudie was apparently </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">the âfirst to be secondâ in print with the original âMatthewismâ ârectangular </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">branchingâ. </span><br /><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">Most significantly, Mudie was both an associate and two times co-author with Darwinâs </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">most prolific informant Edward Blyth. Blythâs own work was edited by Loudon, </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">who cited Matthewâs book in 1832. </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">David Lowâs replication of Matthewâs artificial analogy of differences is, arguably, </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">unlikely to be purely coincidental. They were schoolmates at Perth Academy!</span><br /><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;"> <i><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Nullius</a></i> reveals that </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">Low was apparently twice âfirst to be secondâ with the Matthewisms: âlong continued </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">selectionâ and âoverpowering the lessâ. He used each in different publications. </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">Moreover, Low, just four years older than Matthew, was a highly esteemed </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">Professor of Agriculture at the University of Edinburgh. He might, therefore, </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">be the unnamed naturalist professor of a âcelebrated universityâ who Matthew (1860) </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">claimed, in his second open letter to Darwin in the Gardener's Chronicle, was afraid to teach his heretical and original ideas, for fear of pillory punishment, long before </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">1859. Most importantly, Low was a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">as was Darwinâs great friend and mentor Charles Lyell. Laird Lyellâs manor </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">house was just 20 miles from laird Matthewâs country seat. It seems improbable </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">Lyell did not know of him and the scandal of heretical ideas in his book (more on Lyell and his connections </span><a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22841%2c22841" style="color: #4d469c; line-height: 20px; text-decoration: none;">here</a><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 20px;">). Low's work was very carefully read by Darwin, according to Darwin's own notes, and then recommended by him to the Royal Society for the author's useful work on using artificial selection to explain natural selection.</span><br /><br /><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">A new fallacy has sprung up on social media that I am the only person to </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">believe</span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> that Matthew influenced Darwin and Wallace through knowledge contamination of their influencers and their influencers's influencers or that Darwin more likely than not plagiarised Matthew. In </span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;">reality</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">, <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zJg1mv9xsaYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=BUTLER+LUCK+OR+CUNNING&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjx8_DRiezOAhVqDcAKHb6IBBIQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=MATTHEW&f=false" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Samuel Butler (1887, p, 100</a>) </span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;">believed</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> Darwin copied Matthew but then forgot he had done so. This same c</span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;">ryptomnesia</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> explanation was </span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;">proposed</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> by Darwin's biographer </span></span><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Survival-Charles-Darwin-Ronald-Clark/dp/039452134X" style="color: #4d469c; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px; text-decoration: none;">Clarke (1984)</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">. Furthermore, Loren </span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;"><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Darwin-Mysterious-Mr-Light-Evolutionists/dp/0156239493" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Eiseley (1981)</a> was convinced that </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">Darwin deliberately plagiarised Matthew, as is <a href="http://www.landscapeplanninggroup.co.uk/our-blogs/wp-content/uploads/Milton-Wainwright-Paper-on-Darwin.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Milton Wainwright (2008</a>) and (<a href="http://www.fungimag.com/winter-2011-articles/DarwinLR.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">2011</a>).</span></span><br /><br /><b>FACTS 4</b>. Under the Royal Society imposed conventions for priority, as decided by the Arago Rule (<a href="http://www.strevens.org/research/scistruc/Prioritas.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Strivens 2003</a>), in cases of non-plagiarised claimed dual or multiple independent conceptions, it is only those who are first to actually publish their original discoveries /original conceptions who have scientific priority for them.<br /><b><br /></b><b>FACTS 5.</b> There is no independently verifiable evidence, other than that which Darwin (a <a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">proven serial liar)</a> wrote on his private notebooks and essays in his private study, that Darwin wrote a single word on natural selection anywhere until 1857. The earliest solid dated, independently verifiable, evidence we have that Darwin actually had definitely written any kind of note or essay on the topic pre-1858 is that he sent a mere abstract a private essay to Gray in 1857. See <a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"><b>Sutton 2016</b></a> for the peer reviewed facts of the matter. Moreover, Matthew's (1831) book was published six years before Darwin is claimed to have written a single word on the topic in his private Zoonomia notebook of 1837-38, which opens on the subject of Matthew's area of professional expertise. Namely fruit trees. And contains many other examples (<a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/darwin-hookers-patrick-matthew-and-crab.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"><b>here</b></a>). And Matthew's (1831) book was cited by Darwin's associate and correspondent Robert Chambers in 1832, by Loudon in 1832 (who edited two of Blyth's 1835, 1836 highly influential papers on evolution. Blyth being Darwin's prolific informant and correspondent on the topic) and by Selby in 1842 - the year Darwin is claimed to have penned his first private essay on the topic. Most significantly, Selby went on to be editor of Wallace's Sarawak paper on evolution. Loudon was well known to William Hooker, the father of Darwin's best friend Joseph Hooker, who knew Loudon's work well and praised it to the skies in a book review (see <a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2016</a>).<br /><br />Loudon was also friends and co-author with John Lindley, who deceived the public pre-1858 in order to convince them that he and Lobb were first to propage and import the much loved and famous gaint redwood trees in Britain. All the while he possessed a letter proving that Matthew and his son were first to do so (get the <a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/source-of-matthew-trees-and-john.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">facts <b>here</b></a>). Lindley's glory stealing fraud helped facilitate Darwin's later claim that Matthew was an obscure writer on forest trees.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 6.</b> It is propagandising pseudo-scholarly fact denial behaviour to claim <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22452" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"> nonsense of the kind Richard Dawkins has written</a> on this topic. Namely, that Matthew should have "trumpeted his discovery from the rooftops" to prove he understood what he had conceived at a time when it would have been criminally heretical to do so. Dawkins cherry-steps away from the fact that Matthew (1860) - using real examples - very forcefully informed Darwin of this fact in his second letter to the Gardener's Chronicle, where he told Darwin of an (unnamed) naturalist from a prestigious university who could not to teach his orignal work for fear of pillory punishment - and that his book had been banned by Perth public library in Scotland (he called it by its nickname the Fair City) for the same reason. For the very same reason, Robert Chambers (who is newly discovered to have cited Matthew in 1832) published his heretical <i>Vestiges of Creation</i> - the book that put evolution in the air in the mid 19th century - anonymously until the day he died. See <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014 </a>for citations to the facts.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 7. </b>The <a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/leading-evolutionary-biologists-are.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">rationale (premise) for believing</a> Darwin's and Wallace's claims to have each independently conceived Matthew's prior published origination is built entirely on total belief in Darwin's tale that no naturalist (as told in Darwin's 1860 letter of reply to Matthew in the Gardener's Chronicle) or no one at all (as told by Darwin from the 1861 third edition onwards in every edition of his <i>Origin of Species</i>) is now a punctured myth because it is newly proven that naturalists well known to Darwin and Wallace, and to their influences and their influencer's influencers, in fact did read and then they cited Matthew's (1831) book in the literature years before 1858 <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">(see Sutton 2014).</a> Moreover, <a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/the-blind-eye-is-backward-eye-darwin.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Darwin lied</a> - and so committed glory thieving science fraud - when he claimed from 1860 onwards that no naturalist / no one at all had read Matthew's prior published conception - because Matthew had very plainly and forcefully informed Darwin, by way of his two letters published in the Gardener's Chronicle (1860), that the very opposite was true.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 8. </b>We now newly have 100 per cent proven evidence that routes for knowledge contamination from Matthew's (1831) book to the minds of Darwin and Wallace did exist pre-1858. (See <a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2016</a>). This is better than mere smoking gun evidence.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 9. </b>It is a fallacy that no one who read Matthew's ideas understood them before Darwin and Wallace replicated them and Matthew brought them to Darwin's public attention in 1860. In reality, in the first half of the 19th century, people would have avoided the taboo of writing about them, because they heretically trespassed on the realm of natural divinity regarding the topic of the origin of species. This is why Chambers (who cited Matthew's book in 1832) had to publish anonymously his heretical Vestiges of Creation. Famously, as Darwin admitted from the third edition of the Origin of Species onwards, it was <i>the Vestiges</i> that paved the way for public acceptance of his own book in the second half of the 19th century. With regard to proof of the treatment of Matthew's work as taboo in the first half of that century, <span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="color: #666666; line-height: 20px;">The </span><em style="color: #666666; line-height: 20px;">United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine</em><span style="color: #666666; line-height: 20px;"> published an extended review of it in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine; it praised Matthew's book in around 13,000 words and would say no more on natural selection other than: <span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: medium;">"</span></span></span><b style="color: #666666; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i>But we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature."</i><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></b><b style="color: #666666; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 20px;"> </b><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;">Today, i</span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">t seems that the truth of this independently verifiable fact is heretical, because Wikipedia - in trying to claim that Matthew's orignal ideas were not understood - denies that this text actually </span></span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">exists</span></span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;"> in the 19th </span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;">century</span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> publication record, immediately deleting each and every mention of it (</span></span><a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/live-experiment-with-corrupt-wikipedia.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">get the clickable citation to that literature and the facts on Wikipedia's fact </span></span><span style="line-height: 20px;">deleting</span><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> behaviour </span></span><b style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit; line-height: 20px;">here</b></a><span style="color: #666666; font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">). </span></span>As Matthew explained to Darwin in the Gardener's Chronicle in his second letter of 1860, his book was banned by Perth library in Scotland for its heresy and another naturalist feared to teach its contents for fear of pillory punishment (see<a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2016 for the full facts</a>). <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uma.ark:/13960/t30295b1r;view=1up;seq=716" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">Loudon (1832)</a>, however was so bold as to write that Matthew appeared to have something original to say on the "origin of species", no less.<b> </b>These facts all prove that Matthew's ideas were understood. However, most of those who we knewly know cited Matthew's (1831) book would be unlikely to mention its distasteful heresy in print. Moreover, logically, they did not have to provide evidence in the literature that they fully understood Matthew's then heretical ideas, and they did not even have to fully understand everything about natural selection in his book to know that Matthew had written something on evolution to, therefore, be in a position to give Darwin and Wallace any kind of "heads-up" that Matthew's book might be worth looking at. Because, rationally, knowledge contamination can happen in at least the following three ways (<a href="http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">from Sutton 2016</a>):<br /><br /><b>Prior published unique ideas may contaminate the minds and work of others in three</b><br /><b>main ways:</b><br /><br /><b>(a). Innocent Knowledge Contamination</b>: The spread of original ideas in<br />a prior-publication via (a) subsequent published sources on the topic,<br />which failed to cite the Originator as their source, or (b) word of mouth<br />and/or correspondence to the replicator by those who read the Originatorâs<br />work or communicated with others who did â understood its importance<br />in whole or simply in part â but failed to tell the replicator<br />about its existence.<br /><br /><b>(b). Reckless or Negligent Knowledge Contamination</b>: (a) The replicator<br />reads the original publication, absorbs information such as original<br />ideas and examples and terms, but forgets having read it â and never<br />does remember. (b) The replicator reads the original publication and takes<br />notes, but forgets the source of the notes. (c) The replicator is told<br />about original ideas in a publication by someone â who understands<br />their importance in whole or simply in part â who explains they come<br />from a publication, but the replicator fails to ask the name of the author<br />and title of the publication.<br /><br /><b>(c). Deliberate Knowledge Contamination</b> (science fraud): The replicator<br />reads the original publication, or is told about its contents, takes notes,<br />or is given notes, remembers this, but pretends otherwise.<br /><br /><b>FACTS 10. </b><a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">I<b>t </b>is a fallacy (e.g see Stott 2013)</a><b> </b>that Matthew was quite content after Darwin's 1860 and 1861 acknowledgments of Matthew's prior-published the hypothesis of macro evolution by natural selection. In reality, he fought untill his dying day for full recognition for his original and prior published (1831) deas, which Darwin replicated and continued to call "my theory". See the<a href="http://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/the-saturday-analyst-and-leader-and_56.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;"> fully cited facts here.</a><br /><br /><b>Further Information</b><br /><b><br /></b>My position paper on this topic and details of all known published Darwinite defences to the New Data, along with my detailed and fully evidenced rebuttals to them, can be found on the relevant page on <a href="http://patrickmatthew.com/Darwinist%20Defences%20Examined.html" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">PatrickMatthew.com - Here</a><br /><h3 style="margin: 0px; position: relative;">
</h3>
<h3 style="margin: 0px; position: relative;">
Conclusion</h3>
<div>
<br /></div>
The facts re-write the history of discovery of natural selection.<br /><br />Perhaps we need an independent Veracity Institute to address all issues where independently verifiable facts bust much loved paradigms and then meet fierce resistance from those whose career and financial interests are underpinned by keeping the punctured premises, which support those paradigms, inflated with <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/biological_processes/the-de-facto-macdarwin-industry-and-it-s-member-s-pseudo-scholarly-corporate-denial-of-the-very-existence-of-uncomfortable-new-facts" style="color: #4d469c; text-decoration: none;">de-facto fact-denial pseudo scholarship, cherry picking, cognitive blindsight, propaganda, mythmongering, fallacy spreading, obscene abuse and downright lies</a>.<br /><br /><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 4px; position: relative; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQS2J0WU4g4ChaHhfvVv6JAAAYZeSqbQm8-arq05kQIYxI83pWTY2-Pfx88VP7ODgCZUMosZW7RX_l3iXlkPJl7ut0b-SWkwDcEXDp1I3LCmy08kA9vq7_3QXRKCm7ARL4zwCbWGUFDwQ/s1600/Veracity+Institute.png" imageanchor="1" style="color: #3778cd; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="222" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQS2J0WU4g4ChaHhfvVv6JAAAYZeSqbQm8-arq05kQIYxI83pWTY2-Pfx88VP7ODgCZUMosZW7RX_l3iXlkPJl7ut0b-SWkwDcEXDp1I3LCmy08kA9vq7_3QXRKCm7ARL4zwCbWGUFDwQ/s400/Veracity+Institute.png" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 10.4px;"><b><span style="font-size: x-small;">Get You Some of That Veracity!<br />GYSOT-V<br /></span></b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-39454323843637490772015-10-31T06:49:00.000-07:002015-10-31T12:23:12.745-07:00Happy Hallowe'en: But Did the Scots Poet Burns First coin the Word Halloween?<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNZ5Zryqj4Mw9iefUYDfiB1lbKL_V5IjJdSyFuOoJNXALkknOUdS7NQzFPYieWY1_A6VCIKQso76T4YDgrPNJDq9uxLe07QJF4ebD3qiQ9HsOtbTTEJ7LNtei468y0IF2FLsJNUfhseJg/s1600/Pumpkin.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="185" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNZ5Zryqj4Mw9iefUYDfiB1lbKL_V5IjJdSyFuOoJNXALkknOUdS7NQzFPYieWY1_A6VCIKQso76T4YDgrPNJDq9uxLe07QJF4ebD3qiQ9HsOtbTTEJ7LNtei468y0IF2FLsJNUfhseJg/s200/Pumpkin.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Happy Halloween</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">Today (31 October 2015) is Halloween. And so, from that cause, I deployed my Big Data ID method - which is, incidentally, the same method - s</span><a class="breakable-url" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="background-color: white; color: #005588; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">ee Sutton 2014<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pfnxxtku.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"> - that debunked Charles Darwin's self-serving lie that no naturalist had read Scottish horticulturist Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published full hypothesis of 'the natural process of selection' before he replicated it 27 years later - to discover the first published use of the word Halloween.</span><br />
<br />
The powerful ID method enables me to discover that what appears to be the earliest currently known printed origin of the word 'Halloween' - or more precisely 'Hallow E'en' - is 1724. Moreover, Robert Burns appears to have been first into print in 1786 with the word Halloween from the poem he penned of that name in 1785.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<b><u> Prior knowledge</u></b><br />
<b><u><br /></u></b> At the time of writing,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween"> Wikipedia </a>and seemingly countless other websites vaguely have it that the earliest known usage of the word is "about 1745". The <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=halloween">Online Etymology Dictionary</a> makes the same conveniently vague claim, as does the mighty Chamber's Dictionary of Etymology.<br />
<br />
Incidentally, the same Big Data ID method uniquely discovered that its founder Rober Chambers, author of the Vestiges of Creation, correspondent and associate of Darwin, had earlier read and then cited Matthew's (1831) book in 1832 (<a href="http://britsoccrim.org/new/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf">see Sutton 2104a</a>)<br />
<br />
Chambers Dictionary of Etymology (2012) p 462:<br />
<br />
'Halloween or Hallowe'en about 1745, Scottish shortening of Allhallow-even'.<br />
<br />
More precisely, the ID method enables is to pinpoint the first - to date - discoverable use of the word<br />
<br />
'Hallow E'en' to be 1724. on page 22 of a book by<a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=V7UDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA22-IA3&dq=%22Hallow-e%27en%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMIhcj3xcnsyAIViPEUCh1NyAvk#v=onepage&q=%22Hallow-e'en%22&f=false"> Alan Ramsay entitled The Teatime Miscellany: </a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihH3usCIHJhnA1gAW8rB2UwA71wQtcWufoBdf3lN19xxYKDsszMo6elKFVTM_Q38L5PthJa0s599m7ii6pz9Sa3yS40pYDdsG_UlzR7JSAZ-ytJ16bl40hgG1upKDdWt0VCnrzW3n2wvg/s1600/Halloween.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihH3usCIHJhnA1gAW8rB2UwA71wQtcWufoBdf3lN19xxYKDsszMo6elKFVTM_Q38L5PthJa0s599m7ii6pz9Sa3yS40pYDdsG_UlzR7JSAZ-ytJ16bl40hgG1upKDdWt0VCnrzW3n2wvg/s400/Halloween.jpg" width="300" /></a></div>
Curiously we see from Ramsay's prose that there appears to have been an apparently well-known tune of the same name. Further research reveals this song was published n 1726. (More on Ramsay himself: <a href="http://archiveshub.ac.uk/data/gb231-ms2439">here</a>).<br />
<br />
In 1786 we find what to date appears to be the earliest discoverable use of the unhyphenated word Halloween and it is by none other than the great Scottish poet: <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=IOSyk29GP9AC&pg=PA102&dq=Halloween&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDoQ6AEwBGoVChMIxb6E0N_syAIVAUQUCh1pPwBT#v=onepage&q=Halloween&f=false">Robert Burns (pp 101-102</a>)<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyDMEMmhyphenhyphen9FBeTSvRJvPB7j6XW4yXmcYXMCleeygVei01rlwIRDevsPwcD6PIJGdWeSAguCsxRQU1Asq5ymPbDDv-N0MkbDwXTEbgJ-UGE5M1nP6q66fND5yStaVqL-JEBRSR-00pj1jk/s1600/HalloweenBurns.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyDMEMmhyphenhyphen9FBeTSvRJvPB7j6XW4yXmcYXMCleeygVei01rlwIRDevsPwcD6PIJGdWeSAguCsxRQU1Asq5ymPbDDv-N0MkbDwXTEbgJ-UGE5M1nP6q66fND5yStaVqL-JEBRSR-00pj1jk/s400/HalloweenBurns.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_LRQvmaiPxgwS-Jyzwo9RhpLEgJz0dowSGpYfXHdrlfvVeO0oeCaxifYjkt5vtB7LxuTkAJQRvnR5ITU7gUFbwyGnjwhDkr8dE-XNrCMsP38MxUqsz22RC1lPaKgcshj1KGQVa_IK3MA/s1600/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_LRQvmaiPxgwS-Jyzwo9RhpLEgJz0dowSGpYfXHdrlfvVeO0oeCaxifYjkt5vtB7LxuTkAJQRvnR5ITU7gUFbwyGnjwhDkr8dE-XNrCMsP38MxUqsz22RC1lPaKgcshj1KGQVa_IK3MA/s200/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" width="158" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The book that re-wrote <br />
the history of the discovery<br />
of natural selection</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The trusty ID method strikes once again!<br />
<br />
For more examples of the power of the new research method, check out the free to view Chapter <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U"><i>Nullius In Verba: Darwin's greatest secret</i> </a>at Amazon books<br />
Three - which is an A-Z of busted myths in my book <br />
<br />
If you want to know the real origin of the Easter Bunnie? <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22774">Here it is</a>.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #545454; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 16.5454540252686px;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="color: #545454; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 16.5454540252686px;">'</span></span>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-85171356349575190952015-05-24T13:13:00.000-07:002015-05-25T02:13:44.550-07:00Darwin's and Wallace's Dual Immaculate Deception in Oils<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTv-TfgRXOdFCMXjJwrlJQNigKQr1RS4T0EEwppFCDX5BVztWAhnnnP07mdQMKdUEk2OaK4k3XCZbeQ4F_GbZBGYSLQZ1UMfCNsimg0fAEHLRczudkhTMsw2JehNQQLNECWhFJzz0El_Y/s1600/Darwin+Aleogry+A+Awaiting+Finishing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTv-TfgRXOdFCMXjJwrlJQNigKQr1RS4T0EEwppFCDX5BVztWAhnnnP07mdQMKdUEk2OaK4k3XCZbeQ4F_GbZBGYSLQZ1UMfCNsimg0fAEHLRczudkhTMsw2JehNQQLNECWhFJzz0El_Y/s320/Darwin+Aleogry+A+Awaiting+Finishing.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
The picture was commissioned, in light of new data (<a class="textlink link breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">Sutton 2014</a>) that proves naturalists well known the Darwin and Wallace read and then cited Matthew's book before going on to play roles at the very epicenter of influence on the pre-1858 work of Darwin and Wallace on natural selection. The Blessed Virgin St Mary's conception of Jesus of Nazareth, is a miracle because she became pregnant with the child of "God" whilst surrounded by men who were fertile to some unknown degree. The analogy is perfect because so too were Darwin and Wallace surrounded by man whose brains were fertile - to some unknown degree - with Matthew's unique ideas. Therefore, in the final analysis, if Darwin and Wallace did not conceive Matthew's unique discovery, name for it, examples of it in nature, and his artificial versus natural slection analogy of differences to explain it, by some kind of 'knowledge contamination,' then they must surely have each been mysteriously endowed with a miraculous and divine cognitive contraceptive device (MAD CCD).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Seriously, I don't think belief in miracles has any rational place in helping us to tell the veracious history of the discovery of the theory of natural selection The probability that Darwin and Wallace lied when they each claimed to have independently discovered natural selection seems more likely than not. The New Data and a wealth of further evidence about their lies and deceit suggests Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud by deliberately plagiarizing Matthew's book.</div>
<h4 style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
<strong>Background to Gabriel Wood's painting "Their Immaculate Conception"</strong></h4>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Contrary to the <a class="textlink link breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22881" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">Patrick Matthew Supermyth</a> started by Darwin in 1860 in his own defense, other naturalists in fact did read Matthew's (1831) prior published theory of natural selection.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<strong>At least 25 people cited the book before 1858 and seven of those were naturalists.</strong></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
The Newly Discovered Citing Seven, in date order of their citing of Matthew's book, are:</div>
<div class="topicarticleimg-small-right" id="topicarticleimg-122565" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid transparent; clear: right; color: #999999; float: right; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 20px; margin: 22px -1px -1px 11px; text-align: center; width: 172px;">
<a class="thickbox media {rightsSummary:'Public Domain', rightsDetail:'', rightsURL:'', rightsSimplified:'Public domain', messageID:'what-is-license-public-domain', width:172} breakable-url" href="https://content2.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/b43fea1e-31f5-461a-b027-1b71bab740b5_972.jpeg" rel="article-3954" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" title="Patrick Matthew: The biological father of the theory of natural selection"><img alt="image" src="https://content2.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/b43fea1e-31f5-461a-b027-1b71bab740b5_172.jpeg" style="border: none; margin-bottom: 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="media-rights" style="font-size: 9px; font-style: normal; line-height: 1.2em; padding: 2px 0px 0px; text-align: right; width: 172px;">
<a class="license-public-domain breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22914#" rel="what-is-license-public-domain" style="color: rgb(115, 185, 222) !important; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none !important;">Public Domain</a></div>
<div style="padding: 2px 12px 12px;">
Patrick Matthew: The biological father of the theory of natural selection</div>
</div>
<ol style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;"><a class="textlink link breakable-url" href="https://kindle.amazon.com/post/eih7q-vEQg-5Q6D-VEA1dQ" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">John Loudon (1832)<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pfnxxtku.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a>,</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">Robert Chambers (1832),</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">Edmund Murphy (1834),</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">Cuthbert Johnson (1842),</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">Prideaux John Selby (1842),</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">John Norton (1851)</li>
<li style="clear: left; list-style: decimal !important; margin: 0px; padding: 5px;">William Jameson (1853).</li>
</ol>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Three of these seven naturalists - Loudon, Selby and Chambers - played key roles at the epicenter of influence on both Darwin's and Wallace's pre-1858 work on the theory of natural selection.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Loudon - an associate of Darwin's friends William and Joseph Hooker - edited two of Edward Blyth's (1835, 1836) hugely influential papers on species. Blyth was Darwin's most useful and prolific informant.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Selby edited Wallace's (1855) famous Sarawak paper on natural selection.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Chambers (1844) wrote the best selling Vestiges of Creation - the book that most influenced Wallace, greatly influenced Darwin, and "put evolution in the air" in the first half of the 19th century.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Barring the occurrence of a dual supernatural miracle of immaculate conception by divine cognitive contraception, some kind of '<a class="textlink link breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22628" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">knowledge contamination</a>' appears more likely than not.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<h3>
<a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22914">More details available here on BestThinking</a></h3>
</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-51156721768745218472015-05-16T07:51:00.001-07:002015-05-24T13:14:13.903-07:00How to Make a Significant Contribution to Knowledge to Academic Knowledge<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcD7HgcXBYg8RDhQ8jt-0fDeqYwhsNeAg81gUZQO8z6I2eYm6E_cxdB8HNolv07Gmv96bg_wiGTXcwMCbDVxX1uuWe05oSx2QHzgE6vaaypMMHvt8DzSRfYTjEGkU5PimMuzwiQ40Sh5s/s1600/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcD7HgcXBYg8RDhQ8jt-0fDeqYwhsNeAg81gUZQO8z6I2eYm6E_cxdB8HNolv07Gmv96bg_wiGTXcwMCbDVxX1uuWe05oSx2QHzgE6vaaypMMHvt8DzSRfYTjEGkU5PimMuzwiQ40Sh5s/s200/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" width="158" /></a></div>
<div style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Are you fed up with hearing and reading claptrap? If so, my advice is that you don't waste your valuable time and energy berating the frozen donkeys who stubbornly believe in it. You need to tell them the facts and then share those facts with a wider and more receptive audience.</div>
<div style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Your time and your brain are your most valuable assets. Don't take either for granted. If you are looking for ways to find previously undiscovered, argument winning, independently verifiable facts, you might care to think about buying my book '<b>Nullius in Verba</b>' at the <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #888888; text-decoration: none;"><b>Thinker Books Store </b></a>or on <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook/dp/B00M5DP46U" style="color: #888888; text-decoration: none;"><b>Amazon Books</b></a>. In it you will find out how to uniquely discover your own brand new, hard, confirming or dis-confirming facts.</div>
<div style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
My simple to use new Big Data technology method will work in any area of your interest, allowing you to bust myths and fallacies, thereby providing you with a solid foundation upon which to make your own unique and significant contribution to veracious hard-evidence-based knowledge.</div>
<ul style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.4; margin: 0.5em 0px; padding: 0px 2.5em;"><strong>
<li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><strong><em>They may tell you that it's not what you say but the way that you say it. However, in the real world, in the long-run, facts trump claptrap every time.</em></strong></li>
</strong></ul>
<div style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
If you want to impress your friends, confuse your "enemies", and greatly enhance your cognitive armoury to deal with mere clever rhetoric and soft-beliefs masquerading as knowledge, then read <em><a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;"><b>Nullius in Verba</b></a> </em>today.</div>
<div style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
In this book, in plain English, I lead by example to show you exactly how easy it is to make simple and freely available new Big Data research technology and techniques work for you.</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-24689092803599625542015-05-10T10:25:00.002-07:002015-05-10T12:56:35.980-07:00Matt Rudd of the Sunday Times on Spuriofacts about Spinach<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<a href="http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Magazine/article1551354.ece">In his popular column "The God of Small Things", Matt Rudd (Senior Writer for the Sunday Times) writes on page 5 of the Sunday Times Magazine of May 10th 2015):</a></div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin: auto 40px; padding-left: 20px;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em><strong>'Child A announces he no longer has to eat spinach. </strong>His teacher told him a 19th-century scientist got the decimal point wrong when they recorded its iron content, inadvertently exaggerating it tenfold.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>Popeye's superpowers were founded on a myth he claims.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div class="topicarticleimg-full" id="topicarticleimg-122539" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid transparent; clear: both; color: #999999; float: none; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 20px; margin: 22px -1px -1px; text-align: center; width: 550px;">
<a class="thickbox media {rightsSummary:'Attribution', rightsDetail:'The+Sunday+Times+Magazine+May+10th+2015', rightsURL:'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/', rightsSimplified:'Some rights reserved', messageID:'what-is-license-attribution', width:550} breakable-url" href="https://content2.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/0a56c5c4-46ab-4f3a-884d-7779f728347f_972.jpeg" rel="article-3954" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" title="Article by Matt Rudd, Senior Writer for The Sunday Times."><img alt="image" src="https://content4.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/0a56c5c4-46ab-4f3a-884d-7779f728347f_475.jpeg" style="border: none; margin-bottom: 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="media-rights" style="font-size: 9px; font-style: normal; line-height: 1.2em; padding: 2px 0px 0px; text-align: right; width: 550px;">
<span style="display: block;">The Sunday Times Magazine May 10th 2015</span><a class="license-attribution breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22876#" rel="what-is-license-attribution" style="color: rgb(115, 185, 222) !important; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none !important;">Attribution</a></div>
<div style="padding: 2px 12px 12px;">
Article by Matt Rudd, Senior Writer for The Sunday Times.</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin: auto 40px; padding-left: 20px;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>Wait there while I check, I say. Four days later, I have an answer. It is possibly the most convoluted answer in the history of this column, but I'll give you the short version.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>The decimal point error was first mentioned in an article by Professor Bender in 1971. it has since been used as an example of the importance of accuracy in science.Which is ironic, because there never was a decimal point error in the first place.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>Dr Mike Sutton of Nottingham Trent University spent many, many weeks getting to the bottom of the myth. The confusion comes from the fact that dried spinach conatains a lot more iron (44.5 mg per 100g) than fresh spinach (2.7mg per 100g). It was this, rather than an errant decimal point, that caused the initial muddle. There was another muddle involving iron oxide.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>And then Professor Bender came along with his decimal point story, and now we have a myth about a myth.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>Or a SUPERMYTH, as Dr Sutton calls it.</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>Popeye, by the way, got his superpowers from the beta-carotene in his spinach. Iron had nothing to do with it. To confuse matters much further, spinach still has a relatively high iron content, even without moving any decimal points. But it's still no good. As Sutton points out: "Spinach contains oxalic acid and oxalic acid is an iron blocker."</em></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
So Child A's teacher was right for the wrong reason. And Child A is now trying to find a reason to avoid broccoli.</div>
</blockquote>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-90830539264195541692015-04-23T07:12:00.000-07:002015-04-23T07:15:17.099-07:00Stephen J. Gould: Desperate Darwinist. Just Made Stuff Up To Try To Hide the Truth About Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew.<h4 style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
<strong><a class="breakable-url" href="https://kindle.amazon.com/post/tpXHA0_eSuCB1i3iPU62nw" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Kindle Notes from <em>Nullius</em> (1)<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a></strong></h4>
<div class="topicarticleimg-small-right" id="topicarticleimg-16772" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid transparent; clear: right; color: #999999; float: right; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 20px; margin: 22px -1px -1px 11px; text-align: center; width: 172px;">
<a class="thickbox media {rightsSummary:'Used only with express written permission', rightsDetail:'', rightsURL:'', rightsSimplified:'All rights reserved', messageID:'what-is-license-all-rights-reserved', width:172} breakable-url" href="https://content.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/da0bf667-f8ed-458d-853c-c644bfbed8b3_972.jpeg" rel="article-3954" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" title=""><img alt="image" src="https://content.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/da0bf667-f8ed-458d-853c-c644bfbed8b3_172.jpeg" style="border: none; margin-bottom: 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="media-rights" style="font-size: 9px; font-style: normal; line-height: 1.2em; padding: 2px 0px 0px; text-align: right; width: 172px;">
<a class="license-used-only-with-express-written-permission breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22823#" rel="what-is-license-all-rights-reserved" style="color: rgb(115, 185, 222) !important; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none !important;">Used only with express written permission</a></div>
<div style="padding: 2px 12px 12px;">
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="8f2db815-a738-0be3-6f60-923c3d9cec0d" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"loren eiseley"+sid%3a"8f2db815-a738-0be3-6f60-923c3d9cec0d"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="loren eiseley" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Loren Eiseley</span> (1979) was quite reasonably convinced that Charles Darwin had plagiarized <span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="5e1ebebf-23c3-323d-1ac9-b54e8526c4c0" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"patrick matthew"+sid%3a"5e1ebebf-23c3-323d-1ac9-b54e8526c4c0"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="patrick matthew" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Patrick Matthew</span>'s (1831) discovery that artificial selection is the key to understanding natural selection - What I have named "<a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22780" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">The Artificial versus Natural Selection Explanatory Analogy of Differences"</a>. (First recognised as an analogy by W. J. Dempster 1996, p. 85).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<strong>In Desperate Defense of his Namesake, "Darwin", Famous Leading <span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="a73a9888-19a3-893e-7034-1e98efb75ee5" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"darwinian theory"+sid%3a"a73a9888-19a3-893e-7034-1e98efb75ee5"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="darwinian theory" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Darwinist</span> <span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="530a00ec-e10a-6962-7784-ad2d5fd3323a" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"stephen jay gould"+sid%3a"530a00ec-e10a-6962-7784-ad2d5fd3323a"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="stephen jay gould" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Stephen J, Gould</span> Set Out on a Crusade to "Rubbish" Eiseley's Findings</strong></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Most notably, Eiseley's particular piece of compelling evidence was never addressed by the famous <a class="breakable-url" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Darwinist Gould<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a> (1983, 2002), who selectively criticized Eiseley's other evidence of Darwin's plagiarism of Edward Blyth, who - <a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22816" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">my blog post yesterday</a> explained - cited many times the fact that he was influenced by Robert Mudie - who I discovered in 2014 (<a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;"><strong>see Nullius</strong></a>) was first to replicate in 1832 (1) Matthew's unique term "rectangular branching" and (2) his unique and most powerful explanatory analogy.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Such selective omission lays Gould wide open to accusations of one-sided pseudo-scholarship.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Gould's biased omission is important because ID uniquely reveals that both Low (1844) and Darwin (1844 and 1859) replicated Matthew's (1831) use of this key example, Darwin did so in his private and unpublished 1844 essay - using the exact same examples, and later in the <em>Origin of Species</em> (1859) - using different examples, without citing Matthew (1831), or Low (1844).</div>
<h4 style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
<strong><a class="breakable-url" href="https://kindle.amazon.com/post/zOKbfdezT3GQugAm15wBfQ" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Kindle Notes from <em>Nullius</em> (2)<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a></strong></h4>
<div class="topicarticleimg-small-right" id="topicarticleimg-51060" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid transparent; clear: right; color: #999999; float: right; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 20px; margin: 22px -1px -1px 11px; text-align: center; width: 172px;">
<a class="thickbox media {rightsSummary:'Attribution', rightsDetail:'Dysology.org', rightsURL:'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/', rightsSimplified:'Some rights reserved', messageID:'what-is-license-attribution', width:172} breakable-url" href="https://content2.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/01d4fd86-c080-424c-9fb2-01696ed1fcee_972.jpeg" rel="article-3954" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" title="Bulloney "><img alt="image" src="https://content2.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/01d4fd86-c080-424c-9fb2-01696ed1fcee_172.jpeg" style="border: none; margin-bottom: 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="media-rights" style="font-size: 9px; font-style: normal; line-height: 1.2em; padding: 2px 0px 0px; text-align: right; width: 172px;">
<span style="display: block;">Dysology.org</span><a class="license-attribution breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22823#" rel="what-is-license-attribution" style="color: rgb(115, 185, 222) !important; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none !important;">Attribution</a></div>
<div style="padding: 2px 12px 12px;">
Bulloney</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Steven J Gould (2002) claimed also that: "<em><span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="736229ae-e120-d549-f6bd-d325e101f9e8" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"theory of natural selection"+sid%3a"736229ae-e120-d549-f6bd-d325e101f9e8"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="theory of natural selection" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Natural selection</span>ranked as a standard item in biological discourse.</em>" The implication being that it can't have been coined by way of influence from Matthew's unique term "natural process of selection."</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Despite providing zero evidence to support it, Gould's winning argument has been innocently accepted by credulously biased Darwinist schnooks as proof that Eiseley was naively mistaken in thinking "natural selection" was a rare term.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
In fact, the BigData facilitated ID research method proves Gould was absolutely wrong. Gould was "bulls**tting" in the philosophical sense generally described by <a class="breakable-url" href="http://www.stoa.org.uk/topics/bullshit/pdf/on-bullshit.pdf" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Frankfurt (2005)<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a>. Because In his attempt to keep Matthew buried in oblivion with one-sided, Darwin-friendly inquiry, Gould (2002) essentially wheeled out a myth to accuse Eiseley of committing what he called an "etymological mistake", In reality, with the benefit of BigData technology that faciitates the ID research among over 30 million publications, we now know Eiseley was right and Gould was just being a biased baloney mongering pseudo-scholar - by way of simply making stuff up to suit his own ends. What is most disgraceful is that Darwinists - being so bone bullheadedly greedy to believe anything in their namesake's defense, swallowed Gould's bulloney without even chewing! And they continue to swallow it today.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Proper analysis of the data - as opposed to making stuff up to suit your own ends - reveals that out of over thirty million publications, the precise term 'natural selection' can be found in the literature only four times before Darwin first used it in 1858.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
The first known use of the term 'natural selection' had nothing at all to do with science - the term being used by William Preston (1803) to describe how an artist would select a scene to paint. The second usage was by Darwin's fellow <span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="ab0e97e3-2b63-3d34-f6fa-a89bade6de17" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"royal society"+sid%3a"ab0e97e3-2b63-3d34-f6fa-a89bade6de17"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="royal society" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">Royal Society</span> member, Frances Corbaux (1829) (this use was discovered first by Professor Milton Wainwright), in a very vaguely survival of the fittest human centenarian sense. The third usage was an anonymously authored piece of 1837 to describe how a a hypothesis was chosen as the best - a 'natural selection' over others.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
When asked to account for his use of the term by his publisher "John Murray", Darwin claimed he found the term "natural selection" in the literature on breeding, but could never show where. If he got it from Corbaux then he told another lie. But of that, in this case, we cannot be at all sure. To give Darwin the benefit of the doubt, we must stick to the facts. We know for a fact he used the term in his 1844 private essay. We know for a fact he said he got it from the work of breeders - so let's assume he did get it from the work of breeders. Out of 30+ million publications, which pre-1844 publication by breeders comes close to using the term 'natural selection'? <a class="breakable-url" href="https://kindle.amazon.com/post/TSitbYWmRQCNs2zQf_L_nA" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Only Matthew's 1831 book, coincidentally containing the full theory of natural selection<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a>, and - incidentally - a book on breeding trees! Matthew's is the book that Darwin's associate Chambers read and cited in 1844 and the book that his associate Selby read and cited in 1842. The dates are significant - are they not?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Although he never used the precise term, out of over 30 million publications we know that Matthew 1831 was the first to use the term: 'natural process of selection' and in 1859 Darwin was first to shuffle those same four words into 'process of natural selection'.</div>
<div class="topicarticleimg-small-right" id="topicarticleimg-121860" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid transparent; clear: right; color: #999999; float: right; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 20px; margin: 22px -1px -1px 11px; text-align: center; width: 172px;">
<a class="thickbox media {rightsSummary:'Used only with express written permission', rightsDetail:'Thinker+Media+Inc', rightsURL:'', rightsSimplified:'All rights reserved', messageID:'what-is-license-all-rights-reserved', width:172} breakable-url" href="https://content3.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/f559c899-9c49-4556-a0ca-bec03a932fbf_972.jpeg" rel="article-3954" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" title="Nullius in Verba"><img alt="image" src="https://content3.bestthinking.com/s/1/thinkers/3954/images/f559c899-9c49-4556-a0ca-bec03a932fbf_172.jpeg" style="border: none; margin-bottom: 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="media-rights" style="font-size: 9px; font-style: normal; line-height: 1.2em; padding: 2px 0px 0px; text-align: right; width: 172px;">
<span style="display: block;">Thinker Media Inc</span><a class="license-used-only-with-express-written-permission breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22823#" rel="what-is-license-all-rights-reserved" style="color: rgb(115, 185, 222) !important; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none !important;">Used only with express written permission</a></div>
<div style="padding: 2px 12px 12px;">
Nullius in Verba</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<a class="breakable-url" href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Patrick_Matthew:_priority_and_the_discovery_of_natural_selection" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Patrick Matthew was first to discover and have published the full hypothesis of natural selection<span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; width: 16px;"> </span></a>.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
For the full story of all the strong evidence in favor of the Originator's, Patrick Matthew's, influence on Darwin and Wallace pre-1858 see <a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;"><em>Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret.</em></a>That is my book - a book that pseudo scholarly leading Darwinists and their sheep like followers have read (I know because I am in correspondence with so many) but will not cite in their literature, because they don't want you to read it! They don't want you to read it because it absolutely proves that much of the literature - authored by them and their idols - churned out by the mighty and hugely profitable "Darwin Industry" -- is newly proven with hard and independently verifiable new data to be completely disproven claptrap!</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
When one leading Darwinist has the courage to abide by the motto of the Royal Society (Nullius in Verba - "<em>On the word alone of no one"</em>) and engage fully with new hard data revealed in <em>Nullius</em>, only then will Darwinists thaw out from their current state of being pseudoscholarly Darwin worshiping <span class="bingknowledgewidget" data-entityid="3c49d0b8-2848-2958-0cb5-52476cf5c73e" data-explicit="true" data-filters="ufn%3a"age of enlightenment"+sid%3a"3c49d0b8-2848-2958-0cb5-52476cf5c73e"" data-form="BW3PUB" data-formcodeinside="BWTPFO" data-height="290px" data-processed="true" data-processing="false" data-query="age of enlightenment" data-type="snapshot~dc=dashblack,cse=1,crs=2,cr=0,ss=1,sor=1,nolink=1,ndf=1,vlh=1,sz=99,crres=1,crre=1,fbh=1" data-width="340px" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-width: 2px; cursor: pointer;">pre-Enlightenment</span>-like <strong><a class="breakable-url" href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22748" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;">frozen asinine donkeys.</a></strong></div>
<h4 style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
<strong>The Enlightenment</strong></h4>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
Brodie, A. (2007):</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin: auto 40px; padding-left: 20px;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em;">
<em>'The enlightened person accepts the word of authority not as something to which he has to say âyesâ, but as something to which it is appropriate to subject to critical analysis. The question for the enlightened person therefore is whether the word of authority can stand up to cross-examination before the tribunal of reason. If it can then it is accepted because it is sanctioned not by authority but by reason. If on the other hand it cannot withstand the cross-examination then it has to be discarded, however exalted the source.'</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<strong>From:<em> Brodie, A. (2007) The Scottish Enlightenment: The Historical Age of the Historical Nation. Edinburgh. Birlinn Ltd.</em></strong></div>
<div style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 1em;">
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
A selection of my blog posts and articles on this topic can be found on my website <a class="breakable-url" href="http://patrickmatthew.com/" style="color: #005588; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><span style="color: #005588;">Patrickmatthew.com</span><span class="external-link-marker" style="background-image: url(https://bestthinking.cachefly.net/content/images/pofv3awr.png); background-position: 100% -112px; background-repeat: no-repeat; color: #005588; cursor: pointer; display: inline-block; text-decoration: none; width: 16px;"> </span></a></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">
<br /></div>
<br /></div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-77964894117591261622015-04-12T15:55:00.002-07:002015-04-12T15:55:26.286-07:00A Blemish in the Darling Darwin? How vary dare he!<br />
<em style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">âWhen favourite speculations have been long indulged, and much pains have been bestowed on them, they are viewed with that parental partiality, which cannot bear to hear of faults in the object of its attachment. The mere doubt of an impartial observer is offensive ; and the discovery of anything like a blemish in the darling, is not only ascribed to an entire want of discrimination and judgment, but resented as an injury."</em><br />
<em style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"> </em><span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><b>William Lawrence (1819)</b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><b><br /></b></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXgwjhdS2uYMLTJ0vuQEtAR68aebQbntg2ZIxbs3FbzhxPvXQWV6UxqazwHVvMusW1Fl7yJW647lHEjKMUmGG0fCjTY4_mDqUFS54-gMr1SopKq1xoyZL44J2Sr-3JPZVOjvnbYGxlWUM/s1600/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXgwjhdS2uYMLTJ0vuQEtAR68aebQbntg2ZIxbs3FbzhxPvXQWV6UxqazwHVvMusW1Fl7yJW647lHEjKMUmGG0fCjTY4_mDqUFS54-gMr1SopKq1xoyZL44J2Sr-3JPZVOjvnbYGxlWUM/s1600/Nullius+in+Verba+My+Book.jpeg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B00M5DP46U/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1">Read the reviews</a></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><b><br /></b></span>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-16316548277722704462015-03-21T06:00:00.001-07:002015-03-21T06:00:34.978-07:00Dawkinite<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><span class="post-byline" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span class="author publisher-anchor-color" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: 700; line-height: 13px;"><a data-action="profile" data-role="username" data-username="supermythbuster" href="https://disqus.com/by/supermythbuster/" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(57, 149, 217) !important; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.1s linear;">Supermythbuster</a></span><span style="line-height: 13px;"> </span> </span><span class="post-meta" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block;"><span aria-hidden="true" class="bullet time-ago-bullet" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; font-size: 9.75px; line-height: 1.4; padding: 0px 4px;">â˘</span> <a class="time-ago" data-role="relative-time" href="http://www.yourdictionary.com/dawkinite#comment-1915873846" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 39, 59, 0.34902); font-family: inherit; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.1s linear;" title="Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:39 PM">2 days ago</a></span></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><br /></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22733">Dawkinite</a></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><br /></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><header style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><span style="color: #777777; font-family: Helvetica Neue, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17.3333339691162px;">(1) A fanatical follower of Richard Dawkins's ideas, opinions and beliefs</span></span></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><span style="color: #777777; font-family: Helvetica Neue, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17.3333339691162px;"> (2) A <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22726">meme created by Dr Mike Sutton</a> that is an explanation by analogy to show that all Darwinists are very much like Christians because they believe in the <a href="https://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret">myth-busted</a> miracle of Darwin's and Wallace's dual and independent, immaculate conceptions of a prior published theory, whilst surrounded by admitted influencers who had read it - and so whose minds were fertile to some unknown degree with Matthew's original ideas. Sutton explains that this is perfectly analogous to Christians believing that the Blessed Virgin Mary conceived the child of a supernatural deity whilst surrounded by men who were fertile to some unknown degree.</span></span></header></header><header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 3px; padding-right: 46px;"><br /></header><div class="post-body-inner" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #3f4549; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 15px;">
<div class="post-message-container" data-role="message-container" style="box-sizing: border-box; overflow: hidden; position: relative; width: 848px; zoom: 1;">
<div class="publisher-anchor-color" data-role="message-content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="post-message " data-role="message" dir="auto" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 21px;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-27855018778790005732014-12-15T11:20:00.001-08:002014-12-15T11:23:34.834-08:00Darwin's Science Fraud Transmuted by 19th Century MiracleYou don't have to be daft to be a Darwinist but it helps to worship the claptrap. See the many miracles of St Darwin of Bromley. Learn credulity skills from the words of Bishop Richard Dawkins. See the miracle of the lies turned true. <a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22533">Here</a><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkRBOlaq3LB5OWWL7C_wIy7cDl9NBHGr_T2yAxBNoyewBg05y7x4w4NsHLXALH2eO1bdpRX5rNEWSM-rwy2moW7kARyYjajqAoy5Zvo85zkTRtIGns6_FuHNYo5YIocid4JNoHNa_Z9_M/s1600/stcharles-darwin-head.t.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkRBOlaq3LB5OWWL7C_wIy7cDl9NBHGr_T2yAxBNoyewBg05y7x4w4NsHLXALH2eO1bdpRX5rNEWSM-rwy2moW7kARyYjajqAoy5Zvo85zkTRtIGns6_FuHNYo5YIocid4JNoHNa_Z9_M/s1600/stcharles-darwin-head.t.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">St Darwin</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-499513429744271352014-11-08T03:20:00.000-08:002014-11-08T03:25:52.720-08:00Spuriofact: "No naturalist known to Darwin read Matthew's prior-published hypothesis of natural selection"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkilctDp2rFP18EXN40fMz-6yy9KnxK75_iB20oLKlK6jUrgON341ArDjfn-eUn_H-WOIaQJRu1-Bk8V3Zq2hVTRN2TAHrNqu7KHzUw7Yog0K4cuXn7Oa38mSY-Oh3Lj-00HD6OKA413A/s1600/League+of+Nerds+Interview.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkilctDp2rFP18EXN40fMz-6yy9KnxK75_iB20oLKlK6jUrgON341ArDjfn-eUn_H-WOIaQJRu1-Bk8V3Zq2hVTRN2TAHrNqu7KHzUw7Yog0K4cuXn7Oa38mSY-Oh3Lj-00HD6OKA413A/s1600/League+of+Nerds+Interview.jpg" height="212" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Listen to the debunked myth that was started by Darwin in 1860 and zombie-parroted by fanatical credulous Darwinists for 154 years: <a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/biological_processes/bigdata-darwin-bashing-a-youtube-interview-on-what-the-new-data-now-means">Here</a>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-11041527185657402802014-09-03T07:34:00.005-07:002014-09-03T07:35:18.139-07:00What Defence do Darwin and Wallace Have now Against the Accusation of Science Fraud?Arguably the only defence they have is an irrational trinity of faith. Click<a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/animals_and_plants/after-the-big-data-bombshell-can-darwin-s-and-wallace-s-claims-to-independent-discovery-remain-vertical-"> here</a> to read my article on the aftermath of the big data discovery that changes everything we once held true about the discovery of natural selection.<br />
<br />
Mike SuttonDysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-10219491244032306072014-08-01T09:42:00.001-07:002014-08-01T09:42:23.869-07:00Darwin did not independently discover natural selection <br />
Read the book that dropped the bombshell on the history of biology in 2014. Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud by stealing the discovery of natural selection form Patrick Matthew.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG96PGOdJZj1dJVfkJflEhtlvzzO1c51x5ceJ_qNcdnH-G6dFTDj9WGlzNOmnRNUHOpviLMNBdDGa5cbhSpEVU72StLb6Zr9o5UhlwVYUHJPVDp7l_KHysIkYU6Ym_ddC6i1jjSGE0mxg/s1600/Nullius.jpg" height="400" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/ebooks/science/biology_and_nature/biology/nullius-in-verba-darwin-s-greatest-secret">Click here to find out more about the most important discovery in the history of science</a></div>
<br />Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-38910707895524424412014-06-29T06:32:00.000-07:002014-06-29T06:32:14.998-07:00Darwin's and Wallace's Science Fraud Exposed<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggZxjMV6dWFh1J569tyOn-tV0A76kAWSEW7NksZHuHRppwKfGUsgb2R5DfxXNgM42vN1BQ-_yt5vI86RfytrN1J16AI3UxPb_LkpinhqRNprMmNrmZ8iOca7TopOuLOBOhjrTCC3hdHI0/s1600/ConwayHall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggZxjMV6dWFh1J569tyOn-tV0A76kAWSEW7NksZHuHRppwKfGUsgb2R5DfxXNgM42vN1BQ-_yt5vI86RfytrN1J16AI3UxPb_LkpinhqRNprMmNrmZ8iOca7TopOuLOBOhjrTCC3hdHI0/s1600/ConwayHall.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Patrick Matthew is generally acknowledged as the originator of the
theory of natural selection. He published his discovery of âthe
natural process of selectionâ in a book entitled âOn Naval and Timber
and Arboricultureâ in 1831, which is 27 years before Charles Darwinâs
and Alfred Wallaceâs papers were read before the Linnean Society in
1858.<br />
<br />
The current consensus is that Darwin and Wallace each discovered
natural selection independently of Matthew and independently of one
another. Moreover, Darwin is hailed as the immortal great thinker on the
subject of evolution, because he alone is recognised as first to take
his own discovery of the theory of natural selection forward, with many
confirmatory evidences, convincing others of its veracity and
importance.<br />
<br />
In this talk, Mike Sutton will challenge this view with new evidence
that proves that, pre-1858, Matthewâs book was read by at least seven
naturalists. Three of the seven were at the epicentre of influence on
Darwinâs and Wallaceâs researches and two of those three were personal
associates and correspondents of Darwin and Wallace. He will show that
Matthew, not Darwin, should be celebrated as solver of the problem of
species.<br />
<br />
<span>Dr Michael "Mike" Sutton is Reader in Criminology at Nottingham
Trent University (UK), where he teaches Hi Tech Crime and also Crime
Reduction and Community Safety. Before that he worked for 14 years as a
senior researcher in the Policing and reducing Crime Unit in the Home
Office in London. Mike is the originator of the Market Reduction
Approach (MRA) to theft and co-founder and Chief Editor of the open
access Internet Journal of Criminology. He is a winner of the British
Journal of Criminology Prize for virtual ethnographic research into a
pan-European hacking group.</span><br />
<br />
<span><strong>Doors 10.30, ÂŁ5 in advance, ÂŁ2 concs./Free to Ethical Society members</strong></span><br />
<span><strong>Tea & Coffee will be available</strong></span><br />
<br />
<span><strong><a href="http://conwayhall.org.uk/mike-sutton">Book your tickets through the London Ethical Society: Here</a> </strong></span>Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-527108603809087072014-03-29T09:26:00.003-07:002014-03-29T09:26:46.546-07:00Science Fraud<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF2uBiwG7Y2tAIyuITVBVx9veAVY6rworXG3KkPkv0aInnQvaS9dswhRJIZWT062cl-lUZHcG2_s4_BWlrr2I3JKbR3DDztOpaQitHZyKm1oD4tZOIpRQ_6aVe5GwC_fUyd6e_iMOtwSI/s1600/CounterfeitDiscoverers.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" closure_lm_687787="null" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF2uBiwG7Y2tAIyuITVBVx9veAVY6rworXG3KkPkv0aInnQvaS9dswhRJIZWT062cl-lUZHcG2_s4_BWlrr2I3JKbR3DDztOpaQitHZyKm1oD4tZOIpRQ_6aVe5GwC_fUyd6e_iMOtwSI/s1600/CounterfeitDiscoverers.jpg" height="300" uta="true" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Darwin and Matthew did not discover natural selection independently of its originator Patrick Matthew. 21st Century science discovery proves that Matthew influenced their published ideas. : <a href="http://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/genetics_and_molecular_biology/internet-dating-with-darwin-new-discovery-that-darwin-and-wallace-were-influenced-by-matthew-s-prior-discovery">http://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/genetics_and_molecular_biology/internet-dating-with-darwin-new-discovery-that-darwin-and-wallace-were-influenced-by-matthew-s-prior-discovery</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-40900942529255341372014-02-26T12:47:00.000-08:002014-02-26T12:47:07.896-08:00Science Fraud: Darwin Stole Natural Selection Discovery from Patrick Matthew<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJvGfuoLbmcgcr5E7D9Lg6R90wFC32xfxfG6xbj5CdZEephn3QK_eQCwsTfnUnhX9F6YNQ27N0_GXlT5e4Ue687oatkO_BIXsM0HritN12jnepKFrFfLKAvSb64H5A1GWhu7sN5YNA4v0/s1600/Darwin_LIAR.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJvGfuoLbmcgcr5E7D9Lg6R90wFC32xfxfG6xbj5CdZEephn3QK_eQCwsTfnUnhX9F6YNQ27N0_GXlT5e4Ue687oatkO_BIXsM0HritN12jnepKFrFfLKAvSb64H5A1GWhu7sN5YNA4v0/s1600/Darwin_LIAR.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://patrickmatthew.com/"><span style="font-size: large;">PatrickMatthew.com</span></a></div>
Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892431357755345979.post-16870621961355050522014-02-25T07:25:00.000-08:002014-02-25T07:26:31.367-08:00Alfred Wallace Committed Science Fraud<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU-vnfkhkBUMUgW_Fm2LgXvKg4QVlWdYoBSKPmuI2J_xPrPUTgQB5sqEUL1WF89wBIRgHKALucb9BbsGa8yOLV4Lqc-wP8dfI-FE4ShlXVXhrzN1inw_CKKAejggPkXjYXPPqzrqaWY_k/s1600/Wallace_fraudster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU-vnfkhkBUMUgW_Fm2LgXvKg4QVlWdYoBSKPmuI2J_xPrPUTgQB5sqEUL1WF89wBIRgHKALucb9BbsGa8yOLV4Lqc-wP8dfI-FE4ShlXVXhrzN1inw_CKKAejggPkXjYXPPqzrqaWY_k/s1600/Wallace_fraudster.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Dysologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470745701780667870noreply@blogger.com