Darwin's Science Fraud Transmuted by 19th Century Miracle

You don't have to be daft to be a Darwinist but it helps to worship the claptrap. See the many miracles of St Darwin of Bromley. Learn credulity skills from the words of Bishop Richard Dawkins. See the miracle of the lies turned true. Here

St Darwin

Spuriofact: "No naturalist known to Darwin read Matthew's prior-published hypothesis of natural selection"

Listen to the debunked myth that was started by Darwin in 1860 and zombie-parroted  by fanatical credulous Darwinists for 154 years: Here

What Defence do Darwin and Wallace Have now Against the Accusation of Science Fraud?

Arguably the only defence they have is an irrational trinity of faith. Click here to read my article on the aftermath of the big data discovery that changes everything we once held true about the discovery of natural selection.

Mike Sutton

Darwin did not independently discover natural selection

Read the book that dropped the bombshell on the history of biology in 2014. Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud by stealing the discovery of natural selection form Patrick Matthew.

Click here to find out more about the most important discovery in the history of science

Darwin's and Wallace's Science Fraud Exposed

Patrick Matthew is generally acknowledged as the originator of the theory of natural selection.  He published his discovery of  ‘the natural process of selection’ in a book entitled  ‘On Naval and Timber and Arboriculture’ in 1831, which is 27 years before Charles Darwin’s and Alfred Wallace’s papers were read before the Linnean Society in 1858.

The current consensus is that Darwin and Wallace each discovered natural selection independently of Matthew and independently of one another. Moreover, Darwin is hailed as the immortal great thinker on the subject of evolution, because he alone is recognised as first to take his own discovery of the theory of natural selection forward, with many confirmatory evidences, convincing others of its veracity and importance.

In this talk, Mike Sutton will challenge this view with new evidence that proves that, pre-1858, Matthew’s book was read by at least seven naturalists. Three of the seven were at the epicentre of influence on Darwin’s and Wallace’s researches and two of those three were personal associates and correspondents of Darwin and Wallace. He will show that Matthew, not Darwin, should be celebrated as solver of the problem of species.

Dr Michael "Mike" Sutton is Reader in Criminology at Nottingham Trent University (UK), where he teaches Hi Tech Crime and also Crime Reduction and Community Safety. Before that he worked for 14 years as a senior researcher in the Policing and reducing Crime Unit in the Home Office in London. Mike is the originator of the Market Reduction Approach (MRA) to theft and co-founder and Chief Editor of the open access Internet Journal of Criminology. He is a winner of the British Journal of Criminology Prize for virtual ethnographic research into a pan-European hacking group.

Doors 10.30, £5 in advance, £2 concs./Free to Ethical Society members
Tea & Coffee will be available

Book your tickets through the London Ethical Society: Here

Science Fraud

Darwin and Matthew did not discover natural selection independently of its originator Patrick Matthew. 21st Century science discovery proves that Matthew influenced their published ideas. : http://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/biology_and_nature/genetics_and_molecular_biology/internet-dating-with-darwin-new-discovery-that-darwin-and-wallace-were-influenced-by-matthew-s-prior-discovery

Science Fraud: Darwin Stole Natural Selection Discovery from Patrick Matthew

PatrickMatthew.com

Alfred Wallace Committed Science Fraud

World's Greatest Science Fraud

Prideaux John Selby

In the third edition of the Origin of Species Darwin (1861) wrote:

‘In 1831 Mr. Patrick Matthew published his work on 'Naval Timber and Arboriculture,' in which he gives precisely the same view on the origin of species as that (presently to be alluded to) propounded by Mr. Wallace and myself in the 'Linnean Journal,' and as that enlarged on in the present volume. Unfortunately the view was given by Mr. Matthew very briefly in scattered passages in an Appendix to a work on a different subject, so that it remained unnoticed until Mr. Matthew himself drew attention to it in the 'Gardener's Chronicle,' on April 7th, 1860.’

Nullius in Verba

The seventeenth century Latin motto of the Royal Society, nullius in verba, means ‘on the word of no one’, which informs us that when it comes to claims of fact that scientists should not credulously take somebody’s word for it that something is true.
Contrary to the Darwinist myth that nobody read it, with hi-tech research methods, I have discovered the hidden books in the library that prove Matthew's 1831 book was read and cited by at least seven naturalists before Darwin and Wallace each replicated the unique ideas within it. Three of those naturalists were in Darwin’s inner circle and one, Prideaux John Selby (1842) - in the very year Darwin wrote his first unpublished essay on natural selection - cited Matthew's book many times in his own book on trees and therein commented on his failure to understand Matthew's unique 'survival of the most circumstance suited' notion of power of occupancy.

Read some of the newly discovered evidence of Darwin's and Wallace's great science fraud on my BestThinking blog

Richard Dawkins is Spouting Spuriofacts about Patrick Matthew

Check out Dawkins video -  a link to it - here - is in the comments section of my blog - here - . It is amazing that a scientists who is critical of pseudo-scholarship should take such a clearly pseudo-scholarly approach in his own work!

Discovery of the World's Greatest Science Fraud

In 1859 Charles Darwin published The Origin of Species and therein referred to the theory of natural selection as

“my theory”.

In 1860 Patrick Matthew laid claim in the press to being the originator of the same theory, which he had earlier named 'the natural process of selection'. Darwin capitulated immediately, apologized and acknowledged that Matthew had fully published the entire concept 28 years earlier. Alfred Wallace, another who at the same time as Darwin claimed to have independently discovered Matthew’s prior discovery, agreed. However, both Darwin and Wallace claimed they had no prior knowledge of Matthew’s ideas and excused themselves by further claiming that no one had read them.

Seeing no further than the end of their namesake's pen, and ignoring the scientific principle of nullius in verba, Darwinists believe to this day that Darwin and Wallace independently discovered natural selection. My new book Nullius in Verba (forthcoming) busts every one of Darwin's 154 year old excuses for not having read Matthew's ideas and proves he created a supermyth based upon a number of fallacies, myths and lies coined by himself and Wallace and perpetuated by credulous Darwinists.

Visit the Patrick Matthew website for further details.